Services
Let us save you your most precious asset: Time!
Medical Legal Consulting of Granite State
Reports We Provide
Causation Analysis
When preparing a causation report for personal injury or workers’ compensation, it is essential to create a structured and evidence-based analysis. We begin with an introduction that summarizes the patient’s relevant medical background, detailing the injury or condition in question and the specific incident that led to it. This introduction sets the stage for a comprehensive evaluation of the case.
Next, we include a thorough discussion of the patient’s medical history, highlighting any pre-existing conditions or prior injuries that could influence the current injury. This context is crucial for understanding the overall impact of the incident and how it may have exacerbated existing issues.
The report incorporates the most up-to-date clinical literature and guidelines, ensuring a thorough, efficient, and comprehensive review. By referencing current studies and established practices, we bolster our analysis with credible evidence that supports our conclusions.
We also address potential defense arguments proactively, anticipating objections that may arise from opposing counsel. This preemptive approach allows us to strengthen our position by providing counter-evidence and reasoning, demonstrating that we have considered all angles of the case. Ultimately, our goal is to deliver a clear, well-supported causation report that outlines the connection between the incident and the patient’s condition, providing a robust foundation for any legal proceedings or negotiations.
IME Rebuttal Report
An IME rebuttal report is designed to counter or critique the findings of an independent medical examination. In the report, we should first state our role as the treating physicians or expert reviewers and reference the IME report’s author, date, and purpose. We will provide a neutral summary of the IME’s conclusions, followed by a detailed critique, identifying any factual errors, discrepancies in diagnosis or causation, and gaps in reasoning. We will address omissions or unsupported conclusions and highlight if the IME failed to conduct necessary tests or relied on outdated methods. To strengthen our rebuttal, we will include clinical observations, diagnostic tests, and treatment rationale, referencing relevant medical literature or guidelines as needed. We will conclude by summarizing why the IME’s findings are flawed or incomplete and reaffirm our own diagnosis and causation opinion, emphasizing its alignment with the clinical evidence
Future Care and Cost Assessment
A Future Care and Cost Report Analysis estimates the long-term medical needs and associated expenses for an individual following an injury or illness. This report assesses the patient’s current and future medical requirements, including treatments, surgeries, rehabilitation, medications, and specialized care, based on their condition and prognosis. It also outlines the duration of care, whether short-term, lifelong, or periodic, and provides detailed cost estimates for each type of service, adjusting for inflation where necessary. The report relies on medical records, clinical guidelines, and expert testimony, using current market rates and national databases to support the projected costs. Additionally, it considers potential complications or secondary conditions that may increase future care needs. This analysis is often used in legal cases, settlements, and insurance claims to accurately assess the long-term financial impact of a patient’s ongoing healthcare.
Standards of Care Review
In medical malpractice cases, a standards of care review is essential for assessing the validity and value of a claim. This review focuses on determining whether the healthcare provider adhered to accepted medical standards within their specialty and the specific context of the case. It involves a thorough analysis of the medical records, treatment protocols, and expert opinions to establish if there was a breach of the standard of care.
By evaluating what a reasonably competent practitioner would have done under similar circumstances, we can identify deviations from accepted practices. If a breach is found, it’s critical to demonstrate that this breach directly resulted in harm to the patient. The standards of care review not only establishes liability but also aids in estimating the case’s value by assessing the extent of the patient’s injuries and future medical needs. This foundational analysis is crucial for guiding settlement negotiations and legal strategies, ensuring that compensation accurately reflects the damages linked to the alleged malpractice
Medical Device Safety Compliance Analysis
In our medical device safety litigation review, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of the literature, disclosures, and claims associated with medical devices implicated in legal cases. We begin by surveying existing research and publications on the safety and efficacy of specific devices, including manufacterer’s peer-reviewed studies and post-market surveillance data, to identify reported adverse effects or safety concerns. We also examine regulatory disclosures, such as FDA reports and manufacturer communications, to gain insight into known issues and any corrective actions taken. Our review includes an analysis of the claims made in litigation, assessing allegations of design defects, manufacturing flaws, or insufficient warnings, and evaluating legal precedents established by similar cases. Furthermore, we evaluate the damages claimed by plaintiffs, such as medical expenses and lost wages, to understand the potential value of the case and the device’s impact on the patient’s life. Finally, we address the causation element by determining whether a direct link exists between the device and the injury sustained, reviewing medical records and expert opinions to establish that the device was a substantial factor in the harm experienced. This thorough synthesis of data is essential for guiding our litigation strategy and informing settlement discussions.
Drug Safety Research Review
In our medical device safety litigation review, we perform a comprehensive analysis of the literature, disclosures, and claims related to medical devices involved in legal cases. We start by surveying existing research and publications on the safety and efficacy of specific devices, including manufacturer-funded studies, peer-reviewed articles, and post-market surveillance data, to identify any reported adverse effects or safety concerns. We also examine regulatory disclosures, such as FDA reports and manufacturer communications, to gain insights into known issues and corrective actions taken. Our review includes an assessment of the claims made in litigation, focusing on allegations of design defects, manufacturing flaws, or insufficient warnings, while evaluating legal precedents established by similar cases. Additionally, we evaluate the damages claimed by plaintiffs, including medical expenses and lost wages, to understand the potential value of the case and the device’s impact on the patient’s life. Finally, we address the causation element by determining whether a direct link exists between the device and the sustained injury, reviewing medical records and expert opinions to establish that the device was a substantial factor in the harm experienced. This thorough synthesis of data is crucial for guiding our litigation strategy and informing settlement discussions.
Long Term Facility Compliance Review
In our review of injuries related to long-term care facilities, we systematically examine policies, procedures, training protocols, and staff adherence to these standards. We assess any deviations from guidelines set by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Joint Commission, and other professional standards to identify potential areas of non-compliance. Our analysis includes evaluating the training provided to staff and how well it translates into practice, as adherence to established protocols is crucial for ensuring patient safety. Additionally, we analyze the damages claimed by affected individuals and assess causation by determining whether the injuries sustained can be directly linked to lapses in care or non-compliance with regulatory standards. This comprehensive review is essential for understanding the factors contributing to injuries in long-term care settings and for informing strategies aimed at improving patient safety and facility operations.
Tableside Deposition And Trial Assistance
We provide tableside assistance for depositions and trials for attorneys involved in personal injury cases, focusing on issues related to drugs, medical devices, and medical malpractice. Our role includes offering real-time support during legal proceedings by helping attorneys navigate complex medical information, clarifying terminology, and ensuring that critical evidence is effectively presented. We assist in organizing and summarizing relevant medical records, research findings, and expert opinions, which enhances the attorney’s ability to build a compelling case. Additionally, our expertise allows us to anticipate potential challenges or questions from opposing counsel, enabling attorneys to prepare and respond effectively. This collaborative approach enhances the overall legal strategy and supports attorneys in delivering strong representations for their clients.
Affordable Expert Witnesses
We provide tableside assistance for depositions and trials for attorneys involved in personal injury cases, focusing on issues related to drugs, medical devices, and medical malpractice. Our role includes offering real-time support during legal proceedings by helping attorneys navigate complex medical information, clarifying terminology, and ensuring that critical evidence is effectively presented. We assist in organizing and summarizing relevant medical records, research findings, and expert opinions, which enhances the attorney’s ability to build a compelling case. Additionally, our expertise allows us to anticipate potential challenges or questions from opposing counsel, enabling attorneys to prepare and respond effectively. This collaborative approach enhances the overall legal strategy and supports attorneys in delivering strong representations for their clients.
We know you have a choice. Thank you for choosing us.
With extensive exposure to nearly every type of injury, I bring a wealth of experience in the medical field. Dr. Azkul’s background encompasses work in primary care, where I provided comprehensive healthcare to patients of all ages, and urgent care settings, addressing acute medical issues promptly and effectively. Additionally, Dr. Azkul has significant expertise in occupational health rehabilitation, focusing on helping injured workers regain their functional abilities and return to work.
His experience also includes working in nursing homes, where he provided compassionate care to elderly patients, addressing both acute and chronic conditions. In inpatient settings, he managed complex medical cases, coordinating care for patients with diverse health needs. Furthermore, his work in addiction medicine has equipped him with the skills to treat substance use disorders and support patients in their recovery journeys.
Through his diverse clinical experiences, he has developed a deep understanding of the multifaceted nature of injuries and their impact on patients’ lives. This background informs his current role as a physician consultant, where he applies his knowledge to provide expert insights and evaluations in personal injury, medical malpractice, long term care injuries, drug and device litigation, and workers’ compensation cases.
Dr. Azkul is board certified in family Medicine
Dr. Azkul has active licenses in Massachusetts and New Hampshire.